Re: [PATCH 1/3] virtio: cache indirect desc for split

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 04:55:16 -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 02:19:11PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> > In the case of using indirect, indirect desc must be allocated and
> > released each time, which increases a lot of cpu overhead.
> >
> > Here, a cache is added for indirect. If the number of indirect desc to be
> > applied for is less than VIRT_QUEUE_CACHE_DESC_NUM, the desc array with
> > the size of VIRT_QUEUE_CACHE_DESC_NUM is fixed and cached for reuse.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/virtio/virtio.c      |  6 ++++
> >  drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >  include/linux/virtio.h       | 10 ++++++
> >  3 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> > index 0a5b54034d4b..04bcb74e5b9a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> > @@ -431,6 +431,12 @@ bool is_virtio_device(struct device *dev)
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(is_virtio_device);
> >
> > +void virtio_use_desc_cache(struct virtio_device *dev, bool val)
> > +{
> > +	dev->desc_cache = val;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_use_desc_cache);
> > +
> >  void unregister_virtio_device(struct virtio_device *dev)
> >  {
> >  	int index = dev->index; /* save for after device release */
> > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > index dd95dfd85e98..0b9a8544b0e8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > @@ -117,6 +117,10 @@ struct vring_virtqueue {
> >  	/* Hint for event idx: already triggered no need to disable. */
> >  	bool event_triggered;
> >
> > +	/* Is indirect cache used? */
> > +	bool use_desc_cache;
> > +	void *desc_cache_chain;
> > +
> >  	union {
> >  		/* Available for split ring */
> >  		struct {
>
> Let's use llist_head and friends please (I am guessing we want
> single-linked to avoid writing into indirect buffer after use,
> invalidating the cache, but please document why in a comment).  Do not
> open-code it.
>
> Also hide all casts in inline wrappers.
>
>
> > @@ -423,12 +427,47 @@ static unsigned int vring_unmap_one_split(const struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> >  	return extra[i].next;
> >  }
> >
> > -static struct vring_desc *alloc_indirect_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> > +#define VIRT_QUEUE_CACHE_DESC_NUM 4
>
> Add an inline wrapper for checking sg versus VIRT_QUEUE_CACHE_DESC_NUM.
>
> > +
> > +static void desc_cache_chain_free_split(void *chain)
> > +{
> > +	struct vring_desc *desc;
> > +
> > +	while (chain) {
> > +		desc = chain;
> > +		chain = (void *)desc->addr;
> > +		kfree(desc);
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void desc_cache_put_split(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> > +				 struct vring_desc *desc, int n)
> > +{
> > +	if (vq->use_desc_cache && n <= VIRT_QUEUE_CACHE_DESC_NUM) {
> > +		desc->addr = (u64)vq->desc_cache_chain;
> > +		vq->desc_cache_chain = desc;
> > +	} else {
> > +		kfree(desc);
> > +	}
> > +}
>
>
> > +
> > +static struct vring_desc *alloc_indirect_split(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> >  					       unsigned int total_sg,
> >  					       gfp_t gfp)
> >  {
> >  	struct vring_desc *desc;
> > -	unsigned int i;
> > +	unsigned int i, n;
> > +
> > +	if (vq->use_desc_cache && total_sg <= VIRT_QUEUE_CACHE_DESC_NUM) {
> > +		if (vq->desc_cache_chain) {
> > +			desc = vq->desc_cache_chain;
> > +			vq->desc_cache_chain = (void *)desc->addr;
> > +			goto got;
> > +		}
> > +		n = VIRT_QUEUE_CACHE_DESC_NUM;
>
> Hmm. This will allocate more entries than actually used. Why do it?

If total_sg here is 2, we only allocate two desc here, but if total_sg is 3
later, it will be difficult to use the desc allocated this time.

So if total_sg is less than or equal to 4, a desc array of size 4 is allocated,
so that subsequent desc arrays can be reused when total_sg is less than or
equal to 4. If total_sg is greater than 4, use kmalloc_array to allocate
directly without using the cache.

Thanks.

>
> > +	} else {
> > +		n = total_sg;
> > +	}
> >
> >  	/*
> >  	 * We require lowmem mappings for the descriptors because
> > @@ -437,12 +476,13 @@ static struct vring_desc *alloc_indirect_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> >  	 */
> >  	gfp &= ~__GFP_HIGHMEM;
> >
> > -	desc = kmalloc_array(total_sg, sizeof(struct vring_desc), gfp);
> > +	desc = kmalloc_array(n, sizeof(struct vring_desc), gfp);
> >  	if (!desc)
> >  		return NULL;
> >
> > +got:
> >  	for (i = 0; i < total_sg; i++)
> > -		desc[i].next = cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev, i + 1);
> > +		desc[i].next = cpu_to_virtio16(vq->vq.vdev, i + 1);
> >  	return desc;
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -508,7 +548,7 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> >  	head = vq->free_head;
> >
> >  	if (virtqueue_use_indirect(_vq, total_sg))
> > -		desc = alloc_indirect_split(_vq, total_sg, gfp);
> > +		desc = alloc_indirect_split(vq, total_sg, gfp);
> >  	else {
> >  		desc = NULL;
> >  		WARN_ON_ONCE(total_sg > vq->split.vring.num && !vq->indirect);
> > @@ -652,7 +692,7 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> >  	}
> >
> >  	if (indirect)
> > -		kfree(desc);
> > +		desc_cache_put_split(vq, desc, total_sg);
> >
> >  	END_USE(vq);
> >  	return -ENOMEM;
> > @@ -717,7 +757,7 @@ static void detach_buf_split(struct vring_virtqueue *vq, unsigned int head,
> >  	if (vq->indirect) {
> >  		struct vring_desc *indir_desc =
> >  				vq->split.desc_state[head].indir_desc;
> > -		u32 len;
> > +		u32 len, n;
> >
> >  		/* Free the indirect table, if any, now that it's unmapped. */
> >  		if (!indir_desc)
> > @@ -729,10 +769,12 @@ static void detach_buf_split(struct vring_virtqueue *vq, unsigned int head,
> >  				VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT));
> >  		BUG_ON(len == 0 || len % sizeof(struct vring_desc));
> >
> > -		for (j = 0; j < len / sizeof(struct vring_desc); j++)
> > +		n = len / sizeof(struct vring_desc);
> > +
> > +		for (j = 0; j < n; j++)
> >  			vring_unmap_one_split_indirect(vq, &indir_desc[j]);
> >
> > -		kfree(indir_desc);
> > +		desc_cache_put_split(vq, indir_desc, n);
> >  		vq->split.desc_state[head].indir_desc = NULL;
> >  	} else if (ctx) {
> >  		*ctx = vq->split.desc_state[head].indir_desc;
> > @@ -2199,6 +2241,8 @@ struct virtqueue *__vring_new_virtqueue(unsigned int index,
> >  	vq->indirect = virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC) &&
> >  		!context;
> >  	vq->event = virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_RING_F_EVENT_IDX);
> > +	vq->desc_cache_chain = NULL;
> > +	vq->use_desc_cache = vdev->desc_cache;
> >
> >  	if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_ORDER_PLATFORM))
> >  		vq->weak_barriers = false;
> > @@ -2329,6 +2373,7 @@ void vring_del_virtqueue(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> >  	if (!vq->packed_ring) {
> >  		kfree(vq->split.desc_state);
> >  		kfree(vq->split.desc_extra);
> > +		desc_cache_chain_free_split(vq->desc_cache_chain);
> >  	}
> >  	kfree(vq);
> >  }
> > diff --git a/include/linux/virtio.h b/include/linux/virtio.h
> > index 41edbc01ffa4..d84b7b8f4070 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/virtio.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/virtio.h
> > @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ struct virtio_device {
> >  	bool failed;
> >  	bool config_enabled;
> >  	bool config_change_pending;
> > +	bool desc_cache;
> >  	spinlock_t config_lock;
> >  	spinlock_t vqs_list_lock; /* Protects VQs list access */
> >  	struct device dev;
> > @@ -130,6 +131,15 @@ int register_virtio_device(struct virtio_device *dev);
> >  void unregister_virtio_device(struct virtio_device *dev);
> >  bool is_virtio_device(struct device *dev);
> >
> > +/**
> > + * virtio_use_desc_cache - virtio ring use desc cache
> > + *
> > + * virtio will cache the allocated indirect desc.
> > + *
> > + * This function must be called before find_vqs.
> > + */
> > +void virtio_use_desc_cache(struct virtio_device *dev, bool val);
> > +
> >  void virtio_break_device(struct virtio_device *dev);
> >
> >  void virtio_config_changed(struct virtio_device *dev);
> > --
> > 2.31.0
>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux