Re: [PATCH] virtio_ring: check desc == NULL when packed and indirect

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 11:06 AM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> In the case of packed, use indirect desc, since desc is allocated by
> kmalloc_array(), we should check whether its return value is NULL.
>
> Fixes: 1ce9e6055fa ("virtio_ring: introduce packed ring support")
> Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> index dd95dfd85e98..7dd381eae725 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> @@ -1050,21 +1050,20 @@ static struct vring_packed_desc *alloc_indirect_packed(unsigned int total_sg,
>  }
>
>  static int virtqueue_add_indirect_packed(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> -                                      struct scatterlist *sgs[],
> -                                      unsigned int total_sg,
> -                                      unsigned int out_sgs,
> -                                      unsigned int in_sgs,
> -                                      void *data,
> -                                      gfp_t gfp)
> +                                        struct scatterlist *sgs[],
> +                                        struct vring_packed_desc *desc,
> +                                        unsigned int total_sg,
> +                                        unsigned int out_sgs,
> +                                        unsigned int in_sgs,
> +                                        void *data,
> +                                        gfp_t gfp)

It looks to me the style changes are mixed with bug fix here.

>  {
> -       struct vring_packed_desc *desc;
>         struct scatterlist *sg;
>         unsigned int i, n, err_idx;
>         u16 head, id;
>         dma_addr_t addr;
>
>         head = vq->packed.next_avail_idx;
> -       desc = alloc_indirect_packed(total_sg, gfp);
>
>         if (unlikely(vq->vq.num_free < 1)) {
>                 pr_debug("Can't add buf len 1 - avail = 0\n");
> @@ -1191,9 +1190,15 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_packed(struct virtqueue *_vq,
>
>         BUG_ON(total_sg == 0);
>
> -       if (virtqueue_use_indirect(_vq, total_sg))
> -               return virtqueue_add_indirect_packed(vq, sgs, total_sg,
> -                               out_sgs, in_sgs, data, gfp);
> +       if (virtqueue_use_indirect(_vq, total_sg)) {
> +               desc = alloc_indirect_packed(total_sg, gfp);
> +               if (desc) {
> +                       return virtqueue_add_indirect_packed(vq, sgs, desc,
> +                                                            total_sg,
> +                                                            out_sgs, in_sgs,
> +                                                            data, gfp);
> +               }
> +       }

Any reason that we can't fix virtqueue_add_indirect_packed()? It can
help to reduce the changeset and ease the backport.

Thanks

>
>         head = vq->packed.next_avail_idx;
>         avail_used_flags = vq->packed.avail_used_flags;
> --
> 2.31.0
>

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux