On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 11:36:24PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > >From the interrupt perspective the sequence: > > disable_irq(); > vp_dev->intx_soft_enabled = true; > enable_irq(); > > is perfectly fine as well. Any interrupt arriving during the disabled > section will be reraised on enable_irq() in hardware because it's a > level interrupt. Any resulting failure is either a hardware or a > hypervisor bug. yes but it's a shared interrupt. what happens if multiple callers do this in parallel? _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization