[PATCH 1/9] virtio-blk: validate num_queues during probe

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If an untrusted device neogitates BLK_F_MQ but advertises a zero
num_queues, the driver may end up trying to allocating zero size
buffers where ZERO_SIZE_PTR is returned which may pass the checking
against the NULL. This will lead unexpected results.

Fixing this by using single queue if num_queues is zero.

Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
index e574fbf5e6df..f130d12df4b9 100644
--- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
+++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
@@ -498,7 +498,8 @@ static int init_vq(struct virtio_blk *vblk)
 	err = virtio_cread_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_MQ,
 				   struct virtio_blk_config, num_queues,
 				   &num_vqs);
-	if (err)
+	/* We need at least on virtqueue */
+	if (err || !num_vqs)
 		num_vqs = 1;
 
 	num_vqs = min_t(unsigned int, nr_cpu_ids, num_vqs);
-- 
2.25.1

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux