Re: [RFC PATCH v1 3/7] vhost/vsock: support MSG_EOR bit processing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 11:40:38AM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote:

On 06.08.2021 10:28, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
Caution: This is an external email. Be cautious while opening links or attachments.



On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 07:33:38PM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote:
It works in the same way as 'end-of-message' bit: if packet has
'EOM' bit, also check for 'EOR' bit.

Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
index 3b55de70ac77..3e2b150f9c6f 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
@@ -115,6 +115,7 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock,
              size_t iov_len, payload_len;
              int head;
              bool restore_msg_eom_flag = false;
+              bool restore_msg_eor_flag = false;
Since we now have 2 flags to potentially restore, we could use a single
variable (e.g. uint32_t flags_to_restore), initialized to 0.

We can set all the flags we need to restore and then simply put it
in or with the `pkt->hdr.flags` field.

              spin_lock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock);
              if (list_empty(&vsock->send_pkt_list)) {
@@ -188,6 +189,11 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock,
                      if (le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM) {
                              pkt->hdr.flags &= ~cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM);
                              restore_msg_eom_flag = true;
+
+                              if (le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.flags & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR)) {
                                                                ^
Here it should be `le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR`

+                                      pkt->hdr.flags &= ~cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR);
+                                      restore_msg_eor_flag = true;
+                              }
                      }
              }

@@ -224,9 +230,13 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock,
               * to send it with the next available buffer.
               */
              if (pkt->off < pkt->len) {
-                      if (restore_msg_eom_flag)
+                      if (restore_msg_eom_flag) {
                              pkt->hdr.flags |= cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM);

+                              if (restore_msg_eor_flag)
+                                      pkt->hdr.flags |= cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR);
+                      }
+
If we use a single variable, here we can simply do:

                        pkt->hdr.flags |= cpu_to_le32(flags_to_restore);

Stefano

Thanks, i'll prepare v2 both with spec patch. About spec: i've already sent

patch for SEQPACKET, can i prepare spec patch updating current reviewed

SEQPACKET? E.g. i'll include both EOM and EOR in one patch.

Yep, since spec is not yet merged, I think make sense to have all seqpacket stuff in a single patch.

Thanks,
Stefano

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux