On Tue 06 Jul 10:48 CDT 2021, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> The driver core ignores the return value of this callback because there
> is only little it can do when a device disappears.
>
> This is the final bit of a long lasting cleanup quest where several
> buses were converted to also return void from their remove callback.
> Additionally some resource leaks were fixed that were caused by drivers
> returning an error code in the expectation that the driver won't go
> away.
>
> With struct bus_type::remove returning void it's prevented that newly
> implemented buses return an ignored error code and so don't anticipate
> wrong expectations for driver authors.
>
Thanks for doing this!
Acked-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> (rpmsg and apr)
[..]
> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c
> index c1404d3dae2c..7f6fac618ab2 100644
> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c
> @@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ static int rpmsg_dev_probe(struct device *dev)
> return err;
> }
>
> -static int rpmsg_dev_remove(struct device *dev)
> +static void rpmsg_dev_remove(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct rpmsg_device *rpdev = to_rpmsg_device(dev);
> struct rpmsg_driver *rpdrv = to_rpmsg_driver(rpdev->dev.driver);
> @@ -546,8 +546,6 @@ static int rpmsg_dev_remove(struct device *dev)
>
> if (rpdev->ept)
> rpmsg_destroy_ept(rpdev->ept);
> -
> - return err;
This leaves err assigned but never used, but I don't mind following up
with a patch cleaning that up after this has landed.
> }
>
> static struct bus_type rpmsg_bus = {
Regards,
Bjorn
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
