On 2021/7/5 14:30, Viresh Kumar wrote:
This is still not enough to convince me. So I won't change them for now
until I see it
is the consensus of the majority.
Do you see reqs[i] to ever be NULL here ? If not, then if (req) is like if
(true).
Why would you want to have something like that ?
No. Currently, virtio_i2c_complete_reqs is only called by
virtio_i2c_xfer, thus we don't
have reqs[i] to be NULL. But I think "virtio_i2c_complete_reqs" as an
independent function
should consider this from a callee perspective.
Anyway, if you really think it should be changed, it can be fixed
incrementally as Wolfram said.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization