[RFC PATCH] drm/bochs: bochs_mode_funcs can be static

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/bochs.c:542:36: warning: symbol 'bochs_mode_funcs' was not declared. Should it be static?

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 bochs.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/bochs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/bochs.c
index edcd31db5b9ce..067e043de437d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/bochs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/bochs.c
@@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ bochs_gem_fb_create(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file,
 	return drm_gem_fb_create(dev, file, mode_cmd);
 }
 
-const struct drm_mode_config_funcs bochs_mode_funcs = {
+static const struct drm_mode_config_funcs bochs_mode_funcs = {
 	.fb_create = bochs_gem_fb_create,
 	.mode_valid = drm_vram_helper_mode_valid,
 	.atomic_check = drm_atomic_helper_check,
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux