On 30-06-21, 16:38, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > While we are at it, this has been replaced by a Rust counterpart [1] > > (as that makes it hypervisor agnostic, which is the goal of my work > > here) and I need someone with I2C knowledge to help review it. It > > should be okay even if you don't understand Rust a lot, just review > > this file[2] which is where most of i2c specific stuff lies. > > From the high level review I can provide, it looks good to me. Block > transfers are missing, but I think you said that already. Mising Rust > experience, I might miss details, of course. But the general approach > seems fine to me. smbus_prepare() will get a bit more messy when you add > block transfers, but it still looks bearable, I think. Thanks for having a look. -- viresh _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
