Re: [RFC PATCH v1 08/16] af_vsock: change SEQPACKET receive loop

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 01:03:28PM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote:
>Receive "loop" now really loop: it reads fragments one by
>one, sleeping if queue is empty.
>
>NOTE: 'msg_ready' pointer is not passed to 'seqpacket_dequeue()'
>here - it change callback interface, so it is moved to next patch.
>
>Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>---
> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

I think you can merge patches 8, 9, and 10 together since we
are touching the seqpacket_dequeue() behaviour.

Then you can remove in separate patches the unneeded parts (e.g.
seqpacket_has_data, msg_count, etc.).

Thanks,
Stefano

>
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>index 59ce35da2e5b..9552f05119f2 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>@@ -2003,6 +2003,7 @@ static int __vsock_seqpacket_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
>                                    size_t len, int flags)
> {
>       const struct vsock_transport *transport;
>+      bool msg_ready;
>       struct vsock_sock *vsk;
>       ssize_t record_len;
>       long timeout;
>@@ -2013,23 +2014,36 @@ static int __vsock_seqpacket_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
>       transport = vsk->transport;
>
>       timeout = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
>+      msg_ready = false;
>+      record_len = 0;
>
>-      err = vsock_connectible_wait_data(sk, &wait, timeout, NULL, 0);
>-      if (err <= 0)
>-              goto out;
>+      while (!msg_ready) {
>+              ssize_t fragment_len;
>+              int intr_err;
>
>-      record_len = transport->seqpacket_dequeue(vsk, msg, flags);
>+              intr_err = vsock_connectible_wait_data(sk, &wait, timeout, NULL, 0);
>+              if (intr_err <= 0) {
>+                      err = intr_err;
>+                      break;
>+              }
>
>-      if (record_len < 0) {
>-              err = -ENOMEM;
>-              goto out;
>+              fragment_len = transport->seqpacket_dequeue(vsk, msg, flags);
>+
>+              if (fragment_len < 0) {
>+                      err = -ENOMEM;
>+                      break;
>+              }
>+
>+              record_len += fragment_len;
>       }
>
>       if (sk->sk_err) {
>               err = -sk->sk_err;
>       } else if (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) {
>               err = 0;
>-      } else {
>+      }
>+
>+      if (msg_ready && !err) {
>               /* User sets MSG_TRUNC, so return real length of
>                * packet.
>                */
>@@ -2045,7 +2059,6 @@ static int __vsock_seqpacket_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
>                       msg->msg_flags |= MSG_TRUNC;
>       }
>
>-out:
>       return err;
> }
>
>--
>2.25.1
>

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux