On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 17:59:34 +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote: > From: Igor Skalkin <igor.skalkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Document the properties for arm,scmi-virtio compatible nodes. > The backing virtio SCMI device is described in patch [1]. > > While doing that, make shmem property required only for pre-existing > mailbox and smc transports, since virtio-scmi does not need it. > > [1] https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202102/msg00018.html > > CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> > CC: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Signed-off-by: Igor Skalkin <igor.skalkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > [ Peter: Adapted patch for submission to upstream. ] > Co-developed-by: Peter Hilber <peter.hilber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Peter Hilber <peter.hilber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > [ Cristian: converted to yaml format, moved shmen required property. ] > Co-developed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@xxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@xxxxxxx> > --- > v3 --> V4 > - convertd to YAML > - make shmem required only for pre-existing mailbox and smc transport > - updated VirtIO specification patch message reference > - dropped virtio-mmio SCMI device example since really not pertinent to > virtio-scmi dt bindings transport: it is not even referenced in SCMI > virtio DT node since they are enumerated by VirtIO subsystem and there > could be PCI based SCMI devices anyway. > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml | 8 +++++++- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
