On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 11:17 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> 在 2021/6/11 上午2:39, Jiang Wang 写道:
> > Mergeable rx buffer is already supported by virtio-net, and
> > it can save memory for big packets. It will also be beneficial
> > for the vsock devices, so add it to the spec.
>
>
> A lot of duplication with the virtio-net mergeable rx buffer description.
>
> I wonder whether we can have a generic feature like VIRTIO_F_MRG_BUFFER
> instead.
>
I think we can try to merge the description of mergeable rx buffer
into one place. But for the feature bits themselves, we still use
two feature bits for virtio-net and virtio-vsock. Each will refer to
the same text section for the explanation. Right now,
I basically copied the text from virtio-net for vsock.
For feature bits, I think there might be cases that virtio-net enabled
mergeable rx buffer, but virtio-vsock does not. Then it will be easier
to handle with two feature bits.
> >
> > ---
> > V0 -> V1: I send similar patch with vsock dgram before and
> > already got some comments. This version fixed those,such as
> > use present tense for feature bit etc. Also the feature bit
> > value is 3, because we expect to have some other featue bits
> > defined soon.
> >
> > virtio-vsock.tex | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/virtio-vsock.tex b/virtio-vsock.tex
> > index da7e641..d529291 100644
> > --- a/virtio-vsock.tex
> > +++ b/virtio-vsock.tex
> > @@ -16,7 +16,9 @@ \subsection{Virtqueues}\label{sec:Device Types / Socket Device / Virtqueues}
> >
> > \subsection{Feature bits}\label{sec:Device Types / Socket Device / Feature bits}
> >
> > -There are currently no feature bits defined for this device.
> > +\begin{description}
> > +\item[VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF (3)] Driver can merge receive buffers.
> > +\end{description}
> >
> > \subsection{Device configuration layout}\label{sec:Device Types / Socket Device / Device configuration layout}
> >
> > @@ -64,6 +66,8 @@ \subsection{Device Operation}\label{sec:Device Types / Socket Device / Device Op
> >
> > Packets transmitted or received contain a header before the payload:
> >
> > +If feature VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF is not negotiated, use the following header.
> > +
> > \begin{lstlisting}
> > struct virtio_vsock_hdr {
> > le64 src_cid;
> > @@ -79,6 +83,15 @@ \subsection{Device Operation}\label{sec:Device Types / Socket Device / Device Op
> > };
> > \end{lstlisting}
> >
> > +If feature VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF is negotiated, use the following header.
> > +\begin{lstlisting}
> > +struct virtio_vsock_hdr_mrg_rxbuf {
> > + struct virtio_vsock_hdr hdr;
> > + le16 num_buffers;
> > +};
> > +\end{lstlisting}
> > +
> > +
> > The upper 32 bits of src_cid and dst_cid are reserved and zeroed.
> >
> > Most packets simply transfer data but control packets are also used for
> > @@ -170,6 +183,23 @@ \subsubsection{Buffer Space Management}\label{sec:Device Types / Socket Device /
> > previously receiving a VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_CREDIT_REQUEST packet. This allows
> > communicating updates any time a change in buffer space occurs.
> >
> > +\drivernormative{\paragraph}{Device Operation: Buffer Space Management}{Device Types / Socket Device / Device Operation / Setting Up Receive Buffers}
> > +\begin{itemize}
> > +\item If VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF is negotiated, each buffer MUST be at
> > +least the size of the struct virtio_vsock_hdr_mgr_rxbuf.
> > +\end{itemize}
> > +
> > +\begin{note}
> > +Obviously each buffer can be split across multiple descriptor elements.
> > +\end{note}
> > +
> > +\devicenormative{\paragraph}{Device Operation: Buffer Space Management}{Device Types / Socket Device / Device Operation / Setting Up Receive Buffers}
> > +The device MUST set \field{num_buffers} to the number of descriptors used when
> > +transmitting the packet.
>
>
> Interesting, does this mean it works for tx? Virtio-net had:
>
> "The driver MUST set num_buffers to zero."
>
Nope, I did not mean to support tx. This is for the device side, the
driver set is
the same as what you mentioned.
>
> > +
> > +The device MUST use only a single descriptor if VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF
> > +is not negotiated.
>
>
> Though virtio-net using something similar. But I think we need to
> clarify, what we really need is "a single buffer" not "a single descriptor".
>
OK, will do.
> > +
> > \drivernormative{\paragraph}{Device Operation: Buffer Space Management}{Device Types / Socket Device / Device Operation / Buffer Space Management}
> > VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW data packets MUST only be transmitted when the peer has
> > sufficient free buffer space for the payload.
> > @@ -188,6 +218,7 @@ \subsubsection{Receive and Transmit}\label{sec:Device Types / Socket Device / De
> > The driver queues outgoing packets on the tx virtqueue and incoming packet
> > receive buffers on the rx virtqueue. Packets are of the following form:
> >
> > +If VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF is not negotiated, use the following.
> > \begin{lstlisting}
> > struct virtio_vsock_packet {
> > struct virtio_vsock_hdr hdr;
> > @@ -195,9 +226,41 @@ \subsubsection{Receive and Transmit}\label{sec:Device Types / Socket Device / De
> > };
> > \end{lstlisting}
> >
> > +Otherwise, use the following form:
> > +\begin{lstlisting}
> > +struct virtio_vsock_packet_mrg_rxbuf {
> > + struct virtio_vsock_hdr_mrg_rxbuf hdr;
> > + u8 data[];
> > +};
> > +\end{lstlisting}
> > +
> > Virtqueue buffers for outgoing packets are read-only. Virtqueue buffers for
> > incoming packets are write-only.
> >
> > +When transmitting packets to the device, \field{num_buffers} is not used.
> > +
> > +\begin{enumerate}
> > +\item \field{num_buffers} indicates how many descriptors
>
>
> Similarly, I think what we want here is "buffers" instead of "descriptors".
Sure. Thanks.
> Thanks
>
>
> > + this packet is spread over (including this one).
> > + This is valid only if VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF is negotiated.
> > + This allows receipt of large packets without having to allocate large
> > + buffers: a packet that does not fit in a single buffer can flow
> > + over to the next buffer, and so on. In this case, there will be
> > + at least \field{num_buffers} used buffers in the virtqueue, and the device
> > + chains them together to form a single packet in a way similar to
> > + how it would store it in a single buffer spread over multiple
> > + descriptors.
> > + The other buffers will not begin with a struct virtio_vsock_hdr.
> > +
> > + If VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF is not negotiated, then only one
> > + descriptor is used.
> > +
> > +\item If
> > + \field{num_buffers} is one, then the entire packet will be
> > + contained within this buffer, immediately following the struct
> > + virtio_vsock_hdr.
> > +\end{enumerate}
> > +
> > \drivernormative{\paragraph}{Device Operation: Receive and Transmit}{Device Types / Socket Device / Device Operation / Receive and Transmit}
> >
> > The \field{guest_cid} configuration field MUST be used as the source CID when
> > @@ -213,6 +276,19 @@ \subsubsection{Receive and Transmit}\label{sec:Device Types / Socket Device / De
> > A VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RST reply MUST be sent if a packet is received with an
> > unknown \field{type} value.
> >
> > +If VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF has been negotiated, the device MUST set
> > +\field{num_buffers} to indicate the number of buffers
> > +the packet (including the header) is spread over.
> > +
> > +If a receive packet is spread over multiple buffers, the device
> > +MUST use all buffers but the last (i.e. the first $\field{num_buffers} -
> > +1$ buffers) completely up to the full length of each buffer
> > +supplied by the driver.
> > +
> > +The device MUST use all buffers used by a single receive
> > +packet together, such that at least \field{num_buffers} are
> > +observed by driver as used.
> > +
> > \subsubsection{Stream Sockets}\label{sec:Device Types / Socket Device / Device Operation / Stream Sockets}
> >
> > Connections are established by sending a VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_REQUEST packet. If a
>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
