Re: [PATCH v1 1/8] virtio: Force only split mode with protected guest

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




在 2021/6/3 上午10:56, Andi Kleen 写道:


I agree, but I want to know why indirect descriptor needs to be disabled. The table can't be wrote by the device since it's not coherent swiotlb mapping.

I had all kinds of problems with uninitialized entries in the indirect table. So I gave up on it and concluded it would be too difficult to secure.


-Andi



Ok, but what I meant is this, if we don't read from the descriptor ring, and validate all the other metadata supplied by the device (used id and len). Then there should be no way for the device to suppress the dma flags to write to the indirect descriptor table.

Or do you have an example how it can do that?

Thanks

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux