在 2021/6/3 上午10:18, Andi Kleen 写道:
It looks to me all the evils came from the fact that we depends on
the descriptor ring.
So the checks in this patch could is unnecessary if we don't even
read from the descriptor ring which could be manipulated by the device.
This is what my series tries to achieve:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg241825.html
I would argue that you should boundary check in any case. It was
always a bug to not have boundary checks in such a data structure with
multiple users, trust or not.
But yes your patch series is interesting and definitely makes sense
for TDX too.
Best would be to have both I guess, and always check the boundaries
everywhere.
I agree but some of the checks are unnecessary in we do this series on
top of my series.
So what's the merge status of your series?
If I understand correctly from Michael, I will send a formal series and
he will try to merge it for the 5.14.
Thanks
-Andi
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
