在 2021/6/2 下午1:59, Leon Romanovsky 写道:
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 02:19:03PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
在 2021/5/19 下午10:18, Xianting Tian 写道:
thanks, I submit the patch as commented by Andrew
https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/5/18/256
Actually, if xmit_skb() returns error, below code will give a warning
with error code.
/* Try to transmit */
err = xmit_skb(sq, skb);
/* This should not happen! */
if (unlikely(err)) {
dev->stats.tx_fifo_errors++;
if (net_ratelimit())
dev_warn(&dev->dev,
"Unexpected TXQ (%d) queue failure: %d\n",
qnum, err);
dev->stats.tx_dropped++;
dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
return NETDEV_TX_OK;
}
在 2021/5/18 下午5:54, Michael S. Tsirkin 写道:
typo in subject
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 05:46:56PM +0800, Xianting Tian wrote:
When met error, we output a print to avoid a BUG().
So you don't explain why you need to remove BUG(). I think it deserve a
BUG().
BUG() will crash the machine and virtio_net is not kernel core
functionality that must stop the machine to prevent anything truly
harmful and basic.
Note that the BUG() here is not for virtio-net itself. It tells us that
a bug was found by virtio-net.
That is, the one that produces the skb has a bug, usually it's the
network core.
There could also be the issue of the packet from untrusted source
(userspace like TAP or packet socket) but they should be validated there.
Thanks
I would argue that code in drivers/* shouldn't call BUG() macros at all.
If it is impossible, don't check for that or add WARN_ON() and recover,
but don't crash whole system.
Thanks
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization