On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 02:20:38AM +0200, Peter Hilber wrote: > From: Igor Skalkin <igor.skalkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Document the properties for arm,scmi-virtio compatible nodes. The > backing virtio SCMI device is described in patch [1]. > > [1] https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202005/msg00096.html > > Signed-off-by: Igor Skalkin <igor.skalkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > [ Peter: Adapted patch for submission to upstream. ] > Co-developed-by: Peter Hilber <peter.hilber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Peter Hilber <peter.hilber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt | 35 +++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Seems like it may not be perfectly clear what properties apply or not for the different transports. Can you convert this to DT schema first. > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt > index 667d58e0a659..5d209ba666f6 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt > @@ -13,6 +13,9 @@ the device tree. > Required properties: > > The scmi node with the following properties shall be under the /firmware/ node. > +Some properties are specific to a transport type. > + > +shmem-based transports (mailbox, smc/hvc): > > - compatible : shall be "arm,scmi" or "arm,scmi-smc" for smc/hvc transports > - mboxes: List of phandle and mailbox channel specifiers. It should contain > @@ -21,6 +24,15 @@ The scmi node with the following properties shall be under the /firmware/ node. > supported. > - shmem : List of phandle pointing to the shared memory(SHM) area as per > generic mailbox client binding. > + > +Virtio transport: > + > +- compatible : shall be "arm,scmi-virtio". > + > +The virtio transport only supports a single device. > + > +Additional required properties: > + > - #address-cells : should be '1' if the device has sub-nodes, maps to > protocol identifier for a given sub-node. > - #size-cells : should be '0' as 'reg' property doesn't have any size > @@ -50,7 +62,8 @@ Each protocol supported shall have a sub-node with corresponding compatible > as described in the following sections. If the platform supports dedicated > communication channel for a particular protocol, the 3 properties namely: > mboxes, mbox-names and shmem shall be present in the sub-node corresponding > -to that protocol. > +to that protocol. The virtio transport does not support dedicated communication > +channels. > > Clock/Performance bindings for the clocks/OPPs based on SCMI Message Protocol > ------------------------------------------------------------ > @@ -129,7 +142,8 @@ Required sub-node properties: > [5] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/reset.txt > [6] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.yaml > > -Example: > +Example (mailbox transport): > +---------------------------- > > sram@50000000 { > compatible = "mmio-sram"; > @@ -237,3 +251,20 @@ thermal-zones { > ... > }; > }; > + > +Example (virtio transport): > +--------------------------- > + > +virtio_mmio@4b001000 { > + compatible = "virtio,mmio"; > + ... > +}; > + > +firmware { > + ... > + scmi { > + compatible = "arm,scmi-virtio"; > + ... > + > +The rest is similar to the mailbox transport example, when omitting the > +mailbox/shmem-specific properties. > -- > 2.25.1 > > _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
