On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 05:37:12PM -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
The next patch allows a vhost_worker to handle different devices. To
prepare for that, this patch adds a pointer to the device on the work so
we can get to the different mms in the vhost_worker thread.
Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <michael.christie@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/vhost/scsi.c | 7 ++++---
drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 10 ++++++----
drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 3 ++-
4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/scsi.c b/drivers/vhost/scsi.c
index 2f84cf602ab3..0e862503b6a8 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/scsi.c
@@ -1808,7 +1808,7 @@ static int vhost_scsi_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *f)
if (!vqs)
goto err_vqs;
- vhost_work_init(&vs->vs_event_work, vhost_scsi_evt_work);
+ vhost_work_init(&vs->dev, &vs->vs_event_work, vhost_scsi_evt_work);
vs->vs_events_nr = 0;
vs->vs_events_missed = false;
@@ -1823,7 +1823,7 @@ static int vhost_scsi_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *f)
vqs[i] = &svq->vq;
svq->vs = vs;
init_llist_head(&svq->completion_list);
- vhost_work_init(&svq->completion_work,
+ vhost_work_init(&vs->dev, &svq->completion_work,
vhost_scsi_complete_cmd_work);
svq->vq.handle_kick = vhost_scsi_handle_kick;
}
@@ -2017,7 +2017,8 @@ static int vhost_scsi_port_link(struct se_portal_group *se_tpg,
if (!tmf)
return -ENOMEM;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tmf->queue_entry);
- vhost_work_init(&tmf->vwork, vhost_scsi_tmf_resp_work);
+ vhost_work_init(&tpg->vhost_scsi->dev, &tmf->vwork,
+ vhost_scsi_tmf_resp_work);
`checkpatch.pl --strict` complains here:
CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
#74: FILE: drivers/vhost/scsi.c:2036:
+ vhost_work_init(&tpg->vhost_scsi->dev, &tmf->vwork,
+ vhost_scsi_tmf_resp_work);
mutex_lock(&vhost_scsi_mutex);
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
index fecdae0d18c7..7ba0c303bb98 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
@@ -181,10 +181,12 @@ static int vhost_poll_wakeup(wait_queue_entry_t *wait, unsigned mode, int sync,
return 0;
}
-void vhost_work_init(struct vhost_work *work, vhost_work_fn_t fn)
+void vhost_work_init(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct vhost_work *work,
+ vhost_work_fn_t fn)
{
clear_bit(VHOST_WORK_QUEUED, &work->flags);
work->fn = fn;
+ work->dev = dev;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_work_init);
@@ -200,7 +202,7 @@ void vhost_poll_init(struct vhost_poll *poll, vhost_work_fn_t fn,
poll->wqh = NULL;
poll->vq = vq;
- vhost_work_init(&poll->work, fn);
+ vhost_work_init(dev, &poll->work, fn);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_poll_init);
@@ -269,12 +271,13 @@ void vhost_work_queue(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct vhost_work *work)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_work_queue);
-static void vhost_work_dev_flush_on(struct vhost_worker *worker)
+static void vhost_work_dev_flush_on(struct vhost_dev *dev,
+ struct vhost_worker *worker)
{
struct vhost_flush_struct flush;
init_completion(&flush.wait_event);
- vhost_work_init(&flush.work, vhost_flush_work);
+ vhost_work_init(dev, &flush.work, vhost_flush_work);
vhost_work_queue_on(&flush.work, worker);
wait_for_completion(&flush.wait_event);
@@ -285,7 +288,7 @@ void vhost_work_dev_flush(struct vhost_dev *dev)
int i;
for (i = 0; i < dev->num_workers; i++)
- vhost_work_dev_flush_on(dev->workers[i]);
+ vhost_work_dev_flush_on(dev, dev->workers[i]);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_work_dev_flush);
@@ -305,7 +308,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_has_work);
void vhost_vq_work_flush(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
{
- vhost_work_dev_flush_on(vq->worker);
+ vhost_work_dev_flush_on(vq->dev, vq->worker);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_vq_work_flush);
@@ -572,14 +575,15 @@ static void vhost_attach_cgroups_work(struct vhost_work *work)
s->ret = cgroup_attach_task_all(s->owner, current);
}
-static int vhost_attach_cgroups_on(struct vhost_worker *worker)
+static int vhost_attach_cgroups_on(struct vhost_dev *dev,
+ struct vhost_worker *worker)
{
struct vhost_attach_cgroups_struct attach;
attach.owner = current;
- vhost_work_init(&attach.work, vhost_attach_cgroups_work);
+ vhost_work_init(dev, &attach.work, vhost_attach_cgroups_work);
vhost_work_queue_on(&attach.work, worker);
- vhost_work_dev_flush_on(worker);
+ vhost_work_dev_flush_on(dev, worker);
return attach.ret;
}
@@ -673,7 +677,7 @@ static struct vhost_worker
*vhost_worker_create(struct vhost_dev *dev)
worker->task = task;
wake_up_process(task); /* avoid contributing to loadavg */
- ret = vhost_attach_cgroups_on(worker);
+ ret = vhost_attach_cgroups_on(dev, worker);
if (ret)
goto stop_worker;
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
index 64dc00337389..051dea4e3ab6 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
@@ -21,9 +21,10 @@ typedef void (*vhost_work_fn_t)(struct vhost_work *work);
#define VHOST_WORK_QUEUED 1
struct vhost_work {
- struct llist_node node;
- vhost_work_fn_t fn;
- unsigned long flags;
+ struct llist_node node;
+ vhost_work_fn_t fn;
+ unsigned long flags;
Maybe we should move these changes in another patch since they are not
related.
Thanks,
Stefano
+ struct vhost_dev *dev;
};
struct vhost_worker {
@@ -47,7 +48,8 @@ struct vhost_poll {
struct vhost_virtqueue *vq;
};
-void vhost_work_init(struct vhost_work *work, vhost_work_fn_t fn);
+void vhost_work_init(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct vhost_work *work,
+ vhost_work_fn_t fn);
void vhost_work_queue(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct vhost_work *work);
bool vhost_has_work(struct vhost_dev *dev);
void vhost_vq_work_flush(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq);
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
index f954f4d29c95..302415b6460b 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
@@ -648,7 +648,8 @@ static int vhost_vsock_dev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
file->private_data = vsock;
spin_lock_init(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vsock->send_pkt_list);
- vhost_work_init(&vsock->send_pkt_work, vhost_transport_send_pkt_work);
+ vhost_work_init(&vsock->dev, &vsock->send_pkt_work,
+ vhost_transport_send_pkt_work);
return 0;
out:
--
2.25.1
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization