Re: [PATCH RFC 12/14] vhost: add vhost_dev pointer to vhost_work

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 05:37:12PM -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
The next patch allows a vhost_worker to handle different devices. To
prepare for that, this patch adds a pointer to the device on the work so
we can get to the different mms in the vhost_worker thread.

Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <michael.christie@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/vhost/scsi.c  |  7 ++++---
drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 10 ++++++----
drivers/vhost/vsock.c |  3 ++-
4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/scsi.c b/drivers/vhost/scsi.c
index 2f84cf602ab3..0e862503b6a8 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/scsi.c
@@ -1808,7 +1808,7 @@ static int vhost_scsi_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *f)
	if (!vqs)
		goto err_vqs;

-	vhost_work_init(&vs->vs_event_work, vhost_scsi_evt_work);
+	vhost_work_init(&vs->dev, &vs->vs_event_work, vhost_scsi_evt_work);

	vs->vs_events_nr = 0;
	vs->vs_events_missed = false;
@@ -1823,7 +1823,7 @@ static int vhost_scsi_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *f)
		vqs[i] = &svq->vq;
		svq->vs = vs;
		init_llist_head(&svq->completion_list);
-		vhost_work_init(&svq->completion_work,
+		vhost_work_init(&vs->dev, &svq->completion_work,
				vhost_scsi_complete_cmd_work);
		svq->vq.handle_kick = vhost_scsi_handle_kick;
	}
@@ -2017,7 +2017,8 @@ static int vhost_scsi_port_link(struct se_portal_group *se_tpg,
	if (!tmf)
		return -ENOMEM;
	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tmf->queue_entry);
-	vhost_work_init(&tmf->vwork, vhost_scsi_tmf_resp_work);
+	vhost_work_init(&tpg->vhost_scsi->dev, &tmf->vwork,
+			 vhost_scsi_tmf_resp_work);


`checkpatch.pl --strict` complains here:

CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
#74: FILE: drivers/vhost/scsi.c:2036:
+	vhost_work_init(&tpg->vhost_scsi->dev, &tmf->vwork,
+			 vhost_scsi_tmf_resp_work);

	mutex_lock(&vhost_scsi_mutex);

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
index fecdae0d18c7..7ba0c303bb98 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
@@ -181,10 +181,12 @@ static int vhost_poll_wakeup(wait_queue_entry_t *wait, unsigned mode, int sync,
	return 0;
}

-void vhost_work_init(struct vhost_work *work, vhost_work_fn_t fn)
+void vhost_work_init(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct vhost_work *work,
+		     vhost_work_fn_t fn)
{
	clear_bit(VHOST_WORK_QUEUED, &work->flags);
	work->fn = fn;
+	work->dev = dev;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_work_init);

@@ -200,7 +202,7 @@ void vhost_poll_init(struct vhost_poll *poll, vhost_work_fn_t fn,
	poll->wqh = NULL;
	poll->vq = vq;

-	vhost_work_init(&poll->work, fn);
+	vhost_work_init(dev, &poll->work, fn);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_poll_init);

@@ -269,12 +271,13 @@ void vhost_work_queue(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct vhost_work *work)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_work_queue);

-static void vhost_work_dev_flush_on(struct vhost_worker *worker)
+static void vhost_work_dev_flush_on(struct vhost_dev *dev,
+				    struct vhost_worker *worker)
{
	struct vhost_flush_struct flush;

	init_completion(&flush.wait_event);
-	vhost_work_init(&flush.work, vhost_flush_work);
+	vhost_work_init(dev, &flush.work, vhost_flush_work);

	vhost_work_queue_on(&flush.work, worker);
	wait_for_completion(&flush.wait_event);
@@ -285,7 +288,7 @@ void vhost_work_dev_flush(struct vhost_dev *dev)
	int i;

	for (i = 0; i < dev->num_workers; i++)
-		vhost_work_dev_flush_on(dev->workers[i]);
+		vhost_work_dev_flush_on(dev, dev->workers[i]);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_work_dev_flush);

@@ -305,7 +308,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_has_work);

void vhost_vq_work_flush(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
{
-	vhost_work_dev_flush_on(vq->worker);
+	vhost_work_dev_flush_on(vq->dev, vq->worker);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_vq_work_flush);

@@ -572,14 +575,15 @@ static void vhost_attach_cgroups_work(struct vhost_work *work)
	s->ret = cgroup_attach_task_all(s->owner, current);
}

-static int vhost_attach_cgroups_on(struct vhost_worker *worker)
+static int vhost_attach_cgroups_on(struct vhost_dev *dev,
+				   struct vhost_worker *worker)
{
	struct vhost_attach_cgroups_struct attach;

	attach.owner = current;
-	vhost_work_init(&attach.work, vhost_attach_cgroups_work);
+	vhost_work_init(dev, &attach.work, vhost_attach_cgroups_work);
	vhost_work_queue_on(&attach.work, worker);
-	vhost_work_dev_flush_on(worker);
+	vhost_work_dev_flush_on(dev, worker);
	return attach.ret;
}

@@ -673,7 +677,7 @@ static struct vhost_worker *vhost_worker_create(struct vhost_dev *dev)
	worker->task = task;
	wake_up_process(task); /* avoid contributing to loadavg */

-	ret = vhost_attach_cgroups_on(worker);
+	ret = vhost_attach_cgroups_on(dev, worker);
	if (ret)
		goto stop_worker;

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
index 64dc00337389..051dea4e3ab6 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
@@ -21,9 +21,10 @@ typedef void (*vhost_work_fn_t)(struct vhost_work *work);

#define VHOST_WORK_QUEUED 1
struct vhost_work {
-	struct llist_node	  node;
-	vhost_work_fn_t		  fn;
-	unsigned long		  flags;
+	struct llist_node	node;
+	vhost_work_fn_t		fn;
+	unsigned long		flags;

Maybe we should move these changes in another patch since they are not related.

Thanks,
Stefano

+	struct vhost_dev	*dev;
};

struct vhost_worker {
@@ -47,7 +48,8 @@ struct vhost_poll {
	struct vhost_virtqueue	*vq;
};

-void vhost_work_init(struct vhost_work *work, vhost_work_fn_t fn);
+void vhost_work_init(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct vhost_work *work,
+		     vhost_work_fn_t fn);
void vhost_work_queue(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct vhost_work *work);
bool vhost_has_work(struct vhost_dev *dev);
void vhost_vq_work_flush(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq);
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
index f954f4d29c95..302415b6460b 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
@@ -648,7 +648,8 @@ static int vhost_vsock_dev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
	file->private_data = vsock;
	spin_lock_init(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock);
	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vsock->send_pkt_list);
-	vhost_work_init(&vsock->send_pkt_work, vhost_transport_send_pkt_work);
+	vhost_work_init(&vsock->dev, &vsock->send_pkt_work,
+			vhost_transport_send_pkt_work);
	return 0;

out:
--
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux