Re: [PATCH 3/3] vDPA/ifcvf: get_config_size should return dev specific config size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




在 2021/4/15 下午4:12, Stefano Garzarella 写道:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 05:18:32PM +0800, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
get_config_size() should return the size based on the decected
device type.

Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c | 11 ++++++++++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
index 9b6a38b798fa..b48b9789b69e 100644
--- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
@@ -347,7 +347,16 @@ static u32 ifcvf_vdpa_get_vq_align(struct vdpa_device *vdpa_dev)

static size_t ifcvf_vdpa_get_config_size(struct vdpa_device *vdpa_dev)
{
-    return sizeof(struct virtio_net_config);
+    struct ifcvf_hw *vf = vdpa_to_vf(vdpa_dev);
+    size_t size;
+
+    if (vf->dev_type == VIRTIO_ID_NET)
+        size = sizeof(struct virtio_net_config);
+
+    if (vf->dev_type == VIRTIO_ID_BLOCK)
+        size = sizeof(struct virtio_blk_config);
+
+    return size;

I'm not familiar with the ifcvf details, but can it happen that the device is not block or net?

Should we set `size` to 0 by default to handle this case or are we sure it's one of the two?

Maybe we should add a comment or a warning message in this case, to prevent some analysis tool or compiler from worrying that `size` might be uninitialized.

I was thinking something like this:

    switch(vf->dev_type) {
    case VIRTIO_ID_NET:
        size = sizeof(struct virtio_net_config);
        break;
    case VIRTIO_ID_BLOCK:
        size = sizeof(struct virtio_blk_config);
        break;
    default:
        /* or WARN(1, "") if dev_warn() not apply */
        dev_warn(... , "virtio ID [0x%x] not supported\n")
        size = 0;

    }


Yes, I agree.

Thanks


Thanks,
Stefano


_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux