On 4/15/2021 2:31 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
在 2021/4/15 下午1:55, Zhu Lingshan 写道:
On 4/15/2021 11:34 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
在 2021/4/14 下午5:18, Zhu Lingshan 写道:
This commit enabled Intel FPGA SmartNIC C5000X-PL virtio-block
for vDPA.
Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c | 10 +++++++++-
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
index 1c04cd256fa7..8b403522bf06 100644
--- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
+++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
#include <linux/pci_regs.h>
#include <linux/vdpa.h>
#include <uapi/linux/virtio_net.h>
+#include <uapi/linux/virtio_blk.h>
#include <uapi/linux/virtio_config.h>
#include <uapi/linux/virtio_pci.h>
@@ -28,7 +29,12 @@
#define C5000X_PL_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID 0x8086
#define C5000X_PL_SUBSYS_DEVICE_ID 0x0001
-#define IFCVF_SUPPORTED_FEATURES \
+#define C5000X_PL_BLK_VENDOR_ID 0x1AF4
+#define C5000X_PL_BLK_DEVICE_ID 0x1001
+#define C5000X_PL_BLK_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID 0x8086
+#define C5000X_PL_BLK_SUBSYS_DEVICE_ID 0x0002
+
+#define IFCVF_NET_SUPPORTED_FEATURES \
((1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC) | \
(1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT) | \
(1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1) | \
@@ -37,6 +43,15 @@
(1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM) | \
(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF))
+#define IFCVF_BLK_SUPPORTED_FEATURES \
+ ((1ULL << VIRTIO_BLK_F_SIZE_MAX) | \
+ (1ULL << VIRTIO_BLK_F_SEG_MAX) | \
+ (1ULL << VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE) | \
+ (1ULL << VIRTIO_BLK_F_TOPOLOGY) | \
+ (1ULL << VIRTIO_BLK_F_MQ) | \
+ (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1) | \
+ (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM))
I think we've discussed this sometime in the past but what's the
reason for such whitelist consider there's already a get_features()
implemention?
E.g Any reason to block VIRTIO_BLK_F_WRITE_ZEROS or
VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED?
Thanks
The reason is some feature bits are supported in the device but not
supported by the driver, e.g, for virtio-net, mq & cq implementation
is not ready in the driver.
I understand the case of virtio-net but I wonder why we need this for
block where we don't vq cvq.
Thanks
This is still a subset of the feature bits read from hardware, I leave
it here to code consistently, and indicate what we support clearly.
Are you suggesting remove this feature bits list and just use what we
read from hardware?
Thansk
Thanks!
+
/* Only one queue pair for now. */
#define IFCVF_MAX_QUEUE_PAIRS 1
diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
index 99b0a6b4c227..9b6a38b798fa 100644
--- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
@@ -171,7 +171,11 @@ static u64 ifcvf_vdpa_get_features(struct
vdpa_device *vdpa_dev)
struct ifcvf_hw *vf = vdpa_to_vf(vdpa_dev);
u64 features;
- features = ifcvf_get_features(vf) & IFCVF_SUPPORTED_FEATURES;
+ if (vf->dev_type == VIRTIO_ID_NET)
+ features = ifcvf_get_features(vf) &
IFCVF_NET_SUPPORTED_FEATURES;
+
+ if (vf->dev_type == VIRTIO_ID_BLOCK)
+ features = ifcvf_get_features(vf) &
IFCVF_BLK_SUPPORTED_FEATURES;
return features;
}
@@ -509,6 +513,10 @@ static struct pci_device_id ifcvf_pci_ids[] = {
C5000X_PL_DEVICE_ID,
C5000X_PL_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID,
C5000X_PL_SUBSYS_DEVICE_ID) },
+ { PCI_DEVICE_SUB(C5000X_PL_BLK_VENDOR_ID,
+ C5000X_PL_BLK_DEVICE_ID,
+ C5000X_PL_BLK_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID,
+ C5000X_PL_BLK_SUBSYS_DEVICE_ID) },
{ 0 },
};
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
