On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 2:02 AM Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On 7 Apr 2021, at 20:25, Jiang Wang . <jiang.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 2:51 AM Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> > >>> On 6 Apr 2021, at 20:31, Jiang Wang <jiang.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > >>> From: "jiang.wang" <jiang.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> > >>> Currently, only VMCI supports dgram sockets. To supported > >>> nested VM use case, this patch removes transport_dgram and > >>> uses transport_g2h and transport_h2g for dgram too. > >> > >> Could you provide some background for introducing this change - are you > >> looking at introducing datagrams for a different transport? VMCI datagrams > >> already support the nested use case, > > > > Yes, I am trying to introduce datagram for virtio transport. I wrote a > > spec patch for > > virtio dgram support and also a code patch, but the code patch is still WIP. > > Oh ok. Cool. I must have missed the spec patch - could you provide a reference to > it? Sure. here is the link: https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/2021-April/053543.html > > When I wrote this commit message, I was thinking nested VM is the same as > > multiple transport support. But now, I realize they are different. > > Nested VMs may use > > the same virtualization layer(KVM on KVM), or different virtualization layers > > (KVM on ESXi). Thanks for letting me know that VMCI already supported nested > > use cases. I think you mean VMCI on VMCI, right? > > Right, only VMCI on VMCI. Got it. thanks. > I’ll respond to Stefano’s email for the rest of the discussion. > > Thanks, > Jorgen _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
