在 2021/4/13 下午1:47, Michael S. Tsirkin 写道:
It's unsafe to operate a vq from multiple threads.
Unfortunately this is exactly what we do when invoking
clean tx poll from rx napi.
As a fix move everything that deals with the vq to under tx lock.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index 16d5abed582c..460ccdbb840e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -1505,6 +1505,8 @@ static int virtnet_poll_tx(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
struct virtnet_info *vi = sq->vq->vdev->priv;
unsigned int index = vq2txq(sq->vq);
struct netdev_queue *txq;
+ int opaque;
+ bool done;
if (unlikely(is_xdp_raw_buffer_queue(vi, index))) {
/* We don't need to enable cb for XDP */
@@ -1514,10 +1516,28 @@ static int virtnet_poll_tx(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(vi->dev, index);
__netif_tx_lock(txq, raw_smp_processor_id());
+ virtqueue_disable_cb(sq->vq);
free_old_xmit_skbs(sq, true);
+
+ opaque = virtqueue_enable_cb_prepare(sq->vq);
+
+ done = napi_complete_done(napi, 0);
+
+ if (!done)
+ virtqueue_disable_cb(sq->vq);
+
__netif_tx_unlock(txq);
- virtqueue_napi_complete(napi, sq->vq, 0);
So I wonder why not simply move __netif_tx_unlock() after
virtqueue_napi_complete()?
Thanks
+ if (done) {
+ if (unlikely(virtqueue_poll(sq->vq, opaque))) {
+ if (napi_schedule_prep(napi)) {
+ __netif_tx_lock(txq, raw_smp_processor_id());
+ virtqueue_disable_cb(sq->vq);
+ __netif_tx_unlock(txq);
+ __napi_schedule(napi);
+ }
+ }
+ }
if (sq->vq->num_free >= 2 + MAX_SKB_FRAGS)
netif_tx_wake_queue(txq);
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
