Re: virtio-net: locking in tx napi

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 06:03:50PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> I was working on the spurios interrupt problem and
> I noticed something weird.
> 
> static int virtnet_poll_tx(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
> {       
>         struct send_queue *sq = container_of(napi, struct send_queue, napi);
>         struct virtnet_info *vi = sq->vq->vdev->priv;
>         unsigned int index = vq2txq(sq->vq);
>         struct netdev_queue *txq;
> 
>         if (unlikely(is_xdp_raw_buffer_queue(vi, index))) {
>                 /* We don't need to enable cb for XDP */
>                 napi_complete_done(napi, 0);
>                 return 0;
>         }
> 
>         txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(vi->dev, index);
>         __netif_tx_lock(txq, raw_smp_processor_id());
>         free_old_xmit_skbs(sq, true);
>         __netif_tx_unlock(txq);
>         
>         virtqueue_napi_complete(napi, sq->vq, 0);
>         
>         if (sq->vq->num_free >= 2 + MAX_SKB_FRAGS)
>                 netif_tx_wake_queue(txq);
>         
>         return 0;
> }       
> 
> So virtqueue_napi_complete is called when txq is not locked,
> thinkably start_xmit can happen right?
> 
> Now virtqueue_napi_complete
> 
> static void virtqueue_napi_complete(struct napi_struct *napi,
>                                     struct virtqueue *vq, int processed)
> {
>         int opaque;
> 
>         opaque = virtqueue_enable_cb_prepare(vq);
>         if (napi_complete_done(napi, processed)) {
>                 if (unlikely(virtqueue_poll(vq, opaque)))
>                         virtqueue_napi_schedule(napi, vq);
>         } else {
>                 virtqueue_disable_cb(vq);
>         }
> }
> 
> 
> So it is calling virtqueue_enable_cb_prepare but tx queue
> could be running and can process things in parallel ...
> What gives? I suspect this corrupts the ring, and explains
> why we are seeing weird hangs with vhost packed ring ...
> 
> Jason?
> 
> 
> -- 
> MST

and wouldn't the following untested patch make sense then?


diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index 82e520d2cb12..c23341b18eb5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -1504,6 +1505,8 @@ static int virtnet_poll_tx(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
 	struct virtnet_info *vi = sq->vq->vdev->priv;
 	unsigned int index = vq2txq(sq->vq);
 	struct netdev_queue *txq;
+	int opaque;
+	bool done;
 
 	if (unlikely(is_xdp_raw_buffer_queue(vi, index))) {
 		/* We don't need to enable cb for XDP */
@@ -1514,9 +1517,26 @@ static int virtnet_poll_tx(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
 	txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(vi->dev, index);
 	__netif_tx_lock(txq, raw_smp_processor_id());
 	free_old_xmit_skbs(sq, true);
+
+	opaque = virtqueue_enable_cb_prepare(sq->vq);
+
+	done = napi_complete_done(napi, 0);
+
+	if (!done)
+		virtqueue_disable_cb(sq->vq);
+
 	__netif_tx_unlock(txq);
 
-	virtqueue_napi_complete(napi, sq->vq, 0);
+	if (done) {
+		if (unlikely(virtqueue_poll(vq, opaque))) {
+			if (napi_schedule_prep(napi)) {
+				__netif_tx_lock(txq, raw_smp_processor_id());
+				virtqueue_disable_cb(sq->vq);
+				__netif_tx_unlock(txq);
+				__napi_schedule(napi);
+			}
+		}
+	}
 
 	if (sq->vq->num_free >= 2 + MAX_SKB_FRAGS)
 		netif_tx_wake_queue(txq);

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux