Re: [PATCH 5.10 055/188] virtio_net: Do not pull payload in skb->head

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 05:11:40AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 10:39:29AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > commit 0f6925b3e8da0dbbb52447ca8a8b42b371aac7db upstream.
> > 
> > Xuan Zhuo reported that commit 3226b158e67c ("net: avoid 32 x truesize
> > under-estimation for tiny skbs") brought  a ~10% performance drop.
> > 
> > The reason for the performance drop was that GRO was forced
> > to chain sk_buff (using skb_shinfo(skb)->frag_list), which
> > uses more memory but also cause packet consumers to go over
> > a lot of overhead handling all the tiny skbs.
> > 
> > It turns out that virtio_net page_to_skb() has a wrong strategy :
> > It allocates skbs with GOOD_COPY_LEN (128) bytes in skb->head, then
> > copies 128 bytes from the page, before feeding the packet to GRO stack.
> > 
> > This was suboptimal before commit 3226b158e67c ("net: avoid 32 x truesize
> > under-estimation for tiny skbs") because GRO was using 2 frags per MSS,
> > meaning we were not packing MSS with 100% efficiency.
> > 
> > Fix is to pull only the ethernet header in page_to_skb()
> > 
> > Then, we change virtio_net_hdr_to_skb() to pull the missing
> > headers, instead of assuming they were already pulled by callers.
> > 
> > This fixes the performance regression, but could also allow virtio_net
> > to accept packets with more than 128bytes of headers.
> > 
> > Many thanks to Xuan Zhuo for his report, and his tests/help.
> > 
> > Fixes: 3226b158e67c ("net: avoid 32 x truesize under-estimation for tiny skbs")
> > Reported-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Link: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg731397.html
> > Co-Developed-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> 
> Note that an issue related to this patch was recently reported.
> It's quite possible that the root cause is a bug elsewhere
> in the kernel, but it probably makes sense to defer the backport
> until we know more ...

Thanks, I'll go drop it from all 4 queues.  If you all find out that all
is good, and it should be added back, please let us at stable@vger know
about it.

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux