On 2021/3/2 5:51 下午, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 04:14:18AM -0500, Jason Wang wrote:
When CAP_IPC_LOCK is set we should not check locked memory against
rlimit as what has been implemented in mlock().
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Indeed and it's not just mlock.
Documentation/admin-guide/perf-security.rst:
RLIMIT_MEMLOCK and perf_event_mlock_kb resource constraints are ignored
for processes with the CAP_IPC_LOCK capability.
and let's add a Fixes: tag?
Sure, V2 is posted.
Thanks
---
drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
index ef688c8c0e0e..e93572e2e344 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
@@ -638,7 +638,8 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_process_iotlb_update(struct vhost_vdpa *v,
mmap_read_lock(dev->mm);
lock_limit = rlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
- if (npages + atomic64_read(&dev->mm->pinned_vm) > lock_limit) {
+ if (!capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK) &&
+ (npages + atomic64_read(&dev->mm->pinned_vm) > lock_limit)) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto unlock;
}
--
2.18.1
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
