Re: [PATCH v6 6/9] ALSA: virtio: PCM substream operators

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 28.02.2021 12:32, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 09:59:53 +0100,
Anton Yakovlev wrote:



[snip]


+static snd_pcm_uframes_t
+virtsnd_pcm_pointer(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
+{
+     struct virtio_pcm_substream *vss = snd_pcm_substream_chip(substream);
+     snd_pcm_uframes_t hw_ptr = SNDRV_PCM_POS_XRUN;
+     unsigned long flags;
+
+     spin_lock_irqsave(&vss->lock, flags);
+     if (!vss->xfer_xrun)
+             hw_ptr = bytes_to_frames(substream->runtime, vss->hw_ptr);
+     spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vss->lock, flags);

Oh, and if we drop nonatomc PCM, both trigger and pointer callbacks
are guaranteed to be called inside the spinlock, hence you can remove
*_irqsave() but just us spin_lock() in those two callbacks.

As I understand, spin_lock_irqsave() disables only local interrupts. But
what about other CPU cores?



thanks,

Takashi


--
Anton Yakovlev
Senior Software Engineer

OpenSynergy GmbH
Rotherstr. 20, 10245 Berlin

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux