On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 01:42:27PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2021/2/5 下午11:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 02:55:00PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang<jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx> > > I don't exactly get why we need to split the modern driver out, > > and it can confuse people who are used to be seeing virtio-pci. > > > The virtio-pci module still there. No user visible changes. Just some codes > that could be shared with other driver were split out. > What I am saying is this: we can have virtio-vdpa depend on virtio-pci without splitting the common code out to an extra module. > > > > The vdpa thing so far looks like a development tool, why do > > we care that it depends on a bit of extra code? > > > If I'm not misunderstanding, trying to share codes is proposed by you here: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/10/232 > > We also had the plan to convert IFCVF to use this library. > > Thanks If that happens then an extra module might become useful. -- MST _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization