Re: [RFC PATCH v3 05/13] af_vsock: rest of SEQPACKET support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 02:13:18PM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote:
This does rest of SOCK_SEQPACKET support:
1) Adds socket ops for SEQPACKET type.
2) Allows to create socket with SEQPACKET type.

Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 71 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
index 4600c1ec3bb3..bbc3c31085aa 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
@@ -452,6 +452,7 @@ int vsock_assign_transport(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct vsock_sock *psk)
		new_transport = transport_dgram;
		break;
	case SOCK_STREAM:
+	case SOCK_SEQPACKET:
		if (vsock_use_local_transport(remote_cid))
			new_transport = transport_local;
		else if (remote_cid <= VMADDR_CID_HOST || !transport_h2g ||
@@ -459,6 +460,13 @@ int vsock_assign_transport(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct vsock_sock *psk)
			new_transport = transport_g2h;
		else
			new_transport = transport_h2g;
+
+		if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_SEQPACKET) {

I think you must also check that new_transport is not NULL.

+			if (!new_transport->seqpacket_seq_send_len ||
+			    !new_transport->seqpacket_seq_get_len ||
+			    !new_transport->seqpacket_dequeue)
+				return -ENODEV;

I'm not sure about ENODEV is the better choice in this case, since the transport exists, but it doesn't support SOCK_SEQPACKET, so maybe is better ESOCKTNOSUPPORT.

+		}
		break;
	default:
		return -ESOCKTNOSUPPORT;
@@ -684,6 +692,7 @@ static int __vsock_bind(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr_vm *addr)

	switch (sk->sk_socket->type) {
	case SOCK_STREAM:
+	case SOCK_SEQPACKET:
		spin_lock_bh(&vsock_table_lock);
		retval = __vsock_bind_connectible(vsk, addr);
		spin_unlock_bh(&vsock_table_lock);
@@ -1406,6 +1415,12 @@ static int vsock_stream_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr,
	return vsock_connect(sock, addr, addr_len, flags);
}

+static int vsock_seqpacket_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr,
+				   int addr_len, int flags)
+{
+	return vsock_connect(sock, addr, addr_len, flags);
+}
+
static int vsock_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket *newsock, int flags,
			bool kern)
{
@@ -1633,6 +1648,16 @@ static int vsock_stream_setsockopt(struct socket *sock,
					    optlen);
}

+static int vsock_seqpacket_setsockopt(struct socket *sock,
+				      int level,
+				      int optname,
+				      sockptr_t optval,
+				      unsigned int optlen)
+{
+	return vsock_connectible_setsockopt(sock, level, optname, optval,
+					    optlen);
+}
+
static int vsock_connectible_getsockopt(struct socket *sock,
					int level, int optname,
					char __user *optval,
@@ -1713,6 +1738,15 @@ static int vsock_stream_getsockopt(struct socket *sock,
					    optlen);
}

+static int vsock_seqpacket_getsockopt(struct socket *sock,
+				      int level, int optname,
+				      char __user *optval,
+				      int __user *optlen)
+{
+	return vsock_connectible_getsockopt(sock, level, optname, optval,
+					    optlen);
+}
+
static int vsock_connectible_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
				     size_t len)
{
@@ -1870,6 +1904,12 @@ static int vsock_stream_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
	return vsock_connectible_sendmsg(sock, msg, len);
}

+static int vsock_seqpacket_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
+				   size_t len)
+{
+	return vsock_connectible_sendmsg(sock, msg, len);
+}
+
static int vsock_wait_data(struct sock *sk, struct wait_queue_entry *wait,
			   long timeout,
			   struct vsock_transport_recv_notify_data *recv_data,
@@ -2184,6 +2224,13 @@ vsock_stream_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
	return vsock_connectible_recvmsg(sock, msg, len, flags);
}

+static int
+vsock_seqpacket_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
+			int flags)
+{
+	return vsock_connectible_recvmsg(sock, msg, len, flags);
+}
+

As I said, I think you don't need to implement all of this helpers and you can directly assign the vsock_connectible_* functions in the 'vsock_seqpacket_ops'.

static const struct proto_ops vsock_stream_ops = {
	.family = PF_VSOCK,
	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
@@ -2205,6 +2252,27 @@ static const struct proto_ops vsock_stream_ops = {
	.sendpage = sock_no_sendpage,
};

+static const struct proto_ops vsock_seqpacket_ops = {
+	.family = PF_VSOCK,
+	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+	.release = vsock_release,
+	.bind = vsock_bind,
+	.connect = vsock_seqpacket_connect,
+	.socketpair = sock_no_socketpair,
+	.accept = vsock_accept,
+	.getname = vsock_getname,
+	.poll = vsock_poll,
+	.ioctl = sock_no_ioctl,
+	.listen = vsock_listen,
+	.shutdown = vsock_shutdown,
+	.setsockopt = vsock_seqpacket_setsockopt,
+	.getsockopt = vsock_seqpacket_getsockopt,
+	.sendmsg = vsock_seqpacket_sendmsg,
+	.recvmsg = vsock_seqpacket_recvmsg,
+	.mmap = sock_no_mmap,
+	.sendpage = sock_no_sendpage,
+};
+
static int vsock_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock,
			int protocol, int kern)
{
@@ -2225,6 +2293,9 @@ static int vsock_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock,
	case SOCK_STREAM:
		sock->ops = &vsock_stream_ops;
		break;
+	case SOCK_SEQPACKET:
+		sock->ops = &vsock_seqpacket_ops;
+		break;
	default:
		return -ESOCKTNOSUPPORT;
	}
--
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux