Re: [RFC v2 06/13] vduse: Introduce VDUSE - vDPA Device in Userspace

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2020/12/24 下午4:34, Yongji Xie wrote:
Yes, the disadvantage is the performance. But it should be simpler (I
guess) and we know it can succeed.

Yes, another advantage is that we can support the VM using anonymous memory.


Exactly.



I think I can try this in v3. And the
MMU-based IOMMU implementation can be a future optimization in the
virtio-vdpa case. What's your opinion?
Maybe I was wrong, but I think we can try as what has been proposed here
first and use shadow virtqueue as backup plan if we fail.

OK, I will continue to work on this proposal.


Thanks



_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux