[PATCH v2 02/29] virtio-mem: more precise calculation in virtio_mem_mb_state_prepare_next_mb()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



We actually need one byte less (next_mb_id is exclusive, first_mb_id is
inclusive). While at it, compact the code.

Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c
index a37fd73588da..dee46865bae2 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c
@@ -257,10 +257,8 @@ static enum virtio_mem_mb_state virtio_mem_mb_get_state(struct virtio_mem *vm,
  */
 static int virtio_mem_mb_state_prepare_next_mb(struct virtio_mem *vm)
 {
-	unsigned long old_bytes = vm->next_mb_id - vm->first_mb_id + 1;
-	unsigned long new_bytes = vm->next_mb_id - vm->first_mb_id + 2;
-	int old_pages = PFN_UP(old_bytes);
-	int new_pages = PFN_UP(new_bytes);
+	int old_pages = PFN_UP(vm->next_mb_id - vm->first_mb_id);
+	int new_pages = PFN_UP(vm->next_mb_id - vm->first_mb_id + 1);
 	uint8_t *new_mb_state;
 
 	if (vm->mb_state && old_pages == new_pages)
-- 
2.26.2

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux