On 18.10.20 14:41, Wei Yang wrote: > On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 03:17:06PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> On 16.10.20 10:53, Wei Yang wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 02:53:14PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>>> Let's rename to "sbs_per_mb" and "sb_size" and move accordingly. >>>> >>>> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> One trivial suggestion, could we move this patch close the data structure >>> movement patch? >>> >>> I know this would be some work, since you have changed some of the code logic. >>> This would take you some time to rebase. >> >> You mean after patch #17 ? > > Yes > >> >> I guess I can move patch #18 (prereq) a little further up (e.g., after >> patch #15). Guess moving it in front of #19 shouldn't be too hard. >> >> Will give it a try - if it takes too much effort, I'll leave it like this. >> > > Not a big deal, while it will make the change more intact to me. > > This is a big patch set to me. In case it could be split into two parts, like > bug fix/logic improvement and BBM implementation, that would be more friendly > to review. I'll most probably keep it as a single series, but reshuffle the patches into 1. cleanups 2. preparations 3. BBM That should make things easier to digest. Thanks! -- Thanks, David / dhildenb _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
