Re: [RFC PATCH 10/24] vdpa: introduce config operations for associating ASID to a virtqueue group

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2020/10/12 下午4:17, Eli Cohen wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 03:45:10PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
So in theory we can have several asid's (for different virtqueues), each
one should be followed by a specific set_map call. If this is so, how do
I know if I met all the conditions run my driver? Maybe we need another
callback to let the driver know it should not expect more set_maps().

This should work similarly as in the past. Two parts of the work is expected
to be done by the driver:

1) store the mapping somewhere (e.g hardware) during set_map()
2) associating mapping with a specific virtqueue

The only difference is that more than one mapping is used now.
ok, so like today, I will always get DRIVER_OK after I got all the
set_maps(), right?


Yes.

Thanks



For the issue of more set_maps(), driver should be always ready for the new
set_maps() call instead of not expecting new set_maps() since guest memory
topology could be changed due to several reasons.

Qemu or vhost-vDPA will try their best to avoid the frequency of set_maps()
for better performance (e.g through batched IOTLB updating). E.g there
should be at most one set_map() during one time of guest booting.



_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux