Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] vhost: Don't call log_access_ok() when using IOTLB

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2020/9/30 上午12:30, Greg Kurz wrote:
When the IOTLB device is enabled, the log_guest_addr that is passed by
userspace to the VHOST_SET_VRING_ADDR ioctl, and which is then written
to vq->log_addr, is a GIOVA. All writes to this address are translated
by log_user() to writes to an HVA, and then ultimately logged through
the corresponding GPAs in log_write_hva(). No logging will ever occur
with vq->log_addr in this case. It is thus wrong to pass vq->log_addr
and log_guest_addr to log_access_vq() which assumes they are actual
GPAs.

Introduce a new vq_log_used_access_ok() helper that only checks accesses
to the log for the used structure when there isn't an IOTLB device around.

Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@xxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/vhost/vhost.c |   23 +++++++++++++++++++----
  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
index c3b49975dc28..5996e32fa818 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
@@ -1370,6 +1370,20 @@ bool vhost_log_access_ok(struct vhost_dev *dev)
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_log_access_ok);
+static bool vq_log_used_access_ok(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
+				  void __user *log_base,
+				  bool log_used,
+				  u64 log_addr,
+				  size_t log_size)
+{
+	/* If an IOTLB device is present, log_addr is a GIOVA that
+	 * will never be logged by log_used(). */
+	if (vq->iotlb)
+		return true;
+
+	return !log_used || log_access_ok(log_base, log_addr, log_size);
+}
+
  /* Verify access for write logging. */
  /* Caller should have vq mutex and device mutex */
  static bool vq_log_access_ok(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
@@ -1377,8 +1391,8 @@ static bool vq_log_access_ok(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
  {
  	return vq_memory_access_ok(log_base, vq->umem,
  				   vhost_has_feature(vq, VHOST_F_LOG_ALL)) &&
-		(!vq->log_used || log_access_ok(log_base, vq->log_addr,
-				  vhost_get_used_size(vq, vq->num)));
+		vq_log_used_access_ok(vq, log_base, vq->log_used, vq->log_addr,
+				      vhost_get_used_size(vq, vq->num));
  }
/* Can we start vq? */
@@ -1517,8 +1531,9 @@ static long vhost_vring_set_addr(struct vhost_dev *d,
  			return -EINVAL;
/* Also validate log access for used ring if enabled. */
-		if ((a.flags & (0x1 << VHOST_VRING_F_LOG)) &&
-			!log_access_ok(vq->log_base, a.log_guest_addr,
+		if (!vq_log_used_access_ok(vq, vq->log_base,
+				a.flags & (0x1 << VHOST_VRING_F_LOG),
+				a.log_guest_addr,
  				sizeof *vq->used +
  				vq->num * sizeof *vq->used->ring))


It looks to me that we should use vhost_get_used_size() which takes event into account.

Any reason that we can't reuse vq_log_access_ok() here?

Thanks


  			return -EINVAL;



_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux