Am 29.09.20 um 12:53 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 11:51:15AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Otherwise ttm throws a WARN because we try to pin without a reservation.
Fixes: 9d36d4320462 ("drm/qxl: switch over to the new pin interface")
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.c
index d3635e3e3267..eb45267d51db 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.c
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ int qxl_bo_create(struct qxl_device *qdev,
return r;
}
if (pinned)
- ttm_bo_pin(&bo->tbo);
+ qxl_bo_pin(bo);
I think this is now after ttm_bo_init, and at that point the object is
visible to lru users and everything. So I do think you need to grab locks
here instead of just incrementing the pin count alone.
It's also I think a bit racy, since ttm_bo_init drops the lock, so someone
might have snuck in and evicted the object already.
I think what you need is to call ttm_bo_init_reserved, then ttm_bo_pin,
then ttm_bo_unreserve, all explicitly.
Ah, yes Daniel is right. I thought I've fixed that up, but looks like I
only did that for VMWGFX.
Sorry for the noise, fix to correctly address this is underway.
Regards,
Christian.
-Daniel
*bo_ptr = bo;
return 0;
}
--
2.27.0
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
