On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:38:13AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 11:21:29AM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:00:35AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > OK so this looks good. Can you pls repost with the minor tweak > > > suggested and all acks included, and I will queue this? > > > > My NACK still stands, as long as a few questions are open: > > > > 1) The format used here will be the same as in the ACPI table? I > > think the answer to this questions must be Yes, so this leads > > to the real question: > > I am not sure it's a must. It is, having only one parser for the ACPI and MMIO descriptions was one of the selling points for MMIO in past discussions and I think it makes sense to keep them in sync. > We can always tweak the parser if there are slight differences > between ACPI and virtio formats. There is no guarantee that there only need to be "tweaks" until the ACPI table format is stablized. Regards, Joerg _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
