On 2020-09-21 11:23, Mike Christie wrote: > We might not do the final se_cmd put from vhost_scsi_complete_cmd_work. > If the last put happens a little later then we could race where > vhost_scsi_complete_cmd_work does vhost_signal, the guest runs and sends > more IO, and vhost_scsi_handle_vq runs but does not find any free cmds. > > This patch has us delay completing the cmd until the last lio core ref > is dropped. We then know that once we signal to the guest that the cmd > is completed that if it queues a new command it will find a free cmd. It seems weird to me to see a reference to LIO in the description of a vhost patch? Since this driver supports more backends than LIO, shouldn't the patch description be made more generic? Thanks, Bart. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
