[PATCH] vdpa_sim: init iommu lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch adding the iommu lock did not initialize it.
The struct is zero-initialized so this is mostly a problem
when using lockdep.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 0ea9ee430e74 ("vdpasim: protect concurrent access to iommu iotlb")
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c
index df3224b138ee..604d9d25ca47 100644
--- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c
+++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c
@@ -358,6 +358,7 @@ static struct vdpasim *vdpasim_create(void)
 
 	INIT_WORK(&vdpasim->work, vdpasim_work);
 	spin_lock_init(&vdpasim->lock);
+	spin_lock_init(&vdpasim->iommu_lock);
 
 	dev = &vdpasim->vdpa.dev;
 	dev->coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(64);
-- 
MST

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux