Hi all,
The goal of the series is to give a chance to the architecture
to validate VIRTIO device features.
in this respin:
1) I kept removed the ack from Jason as I reworked the patch
@Jason, the nature and goal of the patch did not really changed
please can I get back your acked-by with these changes?
2) Rewording for warning messages
Regards,
Pierre
Pierre Morel (2):
virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
s390: virtio: PV needs VIRTIO I/O device protection
arch/s390/mm/init.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/virtio_config.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
--
2.25.1
Changelog
to v6:
- rewording warning messages
(Connie, Halil)
to v5:
- return directly from S390 arch_validate_virtio_features()
when the guest is not protected.
(Connie)
- Somme rewording
(Connie, Michael)
- moved back code from arch/s390/ ...kernel/uv.c to ...mm/init.c
(Christian)
to v4:
- separate virtio and arch code
(Pierre)
- moved code from arch/s390/mm/init.c to arch/s390/kernel/uv.c
(as interpreted from Heiko's comment)
- moved validation inside the arch code
(Connie)
- moved the call to arch validation before VIRTIO_F_1 test
(Michael)
to v3:
- add warning
(Connie, Christian)
- add comment
(Connie)
- change hook name
(Halil, Connie)
to v2:
- put the test in virtio_finalize_features()
(Connie)
- put the test inside VIRTIO core
(Jason)
- pass a virtio device as parameter
(Halil)
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
