> Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: introduce xen_vring_use_dma > > Sorry for the late reply -- a couple of conferences kept me busy. > > > On Wed, 1 Jul 2020, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 10:34:53AM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > Would you be in favor of a more flexible check along the lines of > > > the one proposed in the patch that started this thread: > > > > > > if (xen_vring_use_dma()) > > > return true; > > > > > > > > > xen_vring_use_dma would be implemented so that it returns true when > > > xen_swiotlb is required and false otherwise. > > > > Just to stress - with a patch like this virtio can *still* use DMA API > > if PLATFORM_ACCESS is set. So if DMA API is broken on some platforms > > as you seem to be saying, you guys should fix it before doing > > something like this.. > > Yes, DMA API is broken with some interfaces (specifically: rpmesg and trusty), > but for them PLATFORM_ACCESS is never set. That is why the errors weren't > reported before. Xen special case aside, there is no problem under normal > circumstances. > > > If you are OK with this patch (after a little bit of clean-up), Peng, are you OK > with sending an update or do you want me to? If you could help, that would be great. You have more expertise in knowing the whole picture. Thanks, Peng. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
