On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 12:34 PM Catangiu, Adrian Costin <acatan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Cryptographic libraries carry pseudo random number generators to > quickly provide randomness when needed. If such a random pool gets > cloned, secrets may get revealed, as the same random number may get > used multiple times. For fork, this was fixed using the WIPEONFORK > madvise flag [1]. > > Unfortunately, the same problem surfaces when a virtual machine gets > cloned. The existing flag does not help there. This patch introduces a > new flag to automatically clear memory contents on VM suspend/resume, > which will allow random number generators to reseed when virtual > machines get cloned. > > Examples of this are: > - PKCS#11 API reinitialization check (mandated by specification) > - glibc's upcoming PRNG (reseed after wake) > - OpenSSL PRNG (reseed after wake) > > Benefits exist in two spaces: > - The security benefits of a cloned virtual machine having a > re-initialized PRNG in every process are straightforward. > Without reinitialization, two or more cloned VMs could produce > identical random numbers, which are often used to generate secure > keys. > - Provides a simple mechanism to avoid RAM exfiltration during > traditional sleep/hibernate on a laptop or desktop when memory, > and thus secrets, are vulnerable to offline tampering or inspection. For the first usecase, I wonder which way around this would work better - do the wiping when a VM is saved, or do it when the VM is restored? I guess that at least in some scenarios, doing it on restore would be nicer because that way the hypervisor can always instantly save a VM without having to wait for the guest to say "alright, I'm ready" - especially if someone e.g. wants to take a snapshot of a running VM while keeping it running? Or do hypervisors inject such ACPI transitions every time they snapshot/save/restore a VM anyway? > This RFC is foremost aimed at defining a userspace interface to enable > applications and libraries that store or cache sensitive information, > to know that they need to regenerate it after process memory has been > exposed to potential copying. The proposed userspace interface is > a new MADV_WIPEONSUSPEND 'madvise()' flag used to mark pages which > contain such data. This newly added flag would only be available on > 64bit archs, since we've run out of 32bit VMA flags. > > The mechanism through which the kernel marks the application sensitive > data as potentially copied, is a secondary objective of this RFC. In > the current PoC proposal, the RFC kernel code combines > MADV_WIPEONSUSPEND semantics with ACPI suspend/wake transitions to zero > out all process pages that fall in VMAs marked as MADV_WIPEONSUSPEND > and thus allow applications and libraries be notified and regenerate > their sensitive data. Marking VMAs as MADV_WIPEONSUSPEND results in > the VMAs being empty in the process after any suspend/wake cycle. > Similar to MADV_WIPEONFORK, if the process accesses memory that was > wiped on suspend, it will get zeroes. The address ranges are still > valid, they are just empty. > > This patch adds logic to the kernel power code to zero out contents of > all MADV_WIPEONSUSPEND VMAs present in the system during its transition > to any suspend state equal or greater/deeper than Suspend-to-memory, > known as S3. > > MADV_WIPEONSUSPEND only works on private, anonymous mappings. > The patch also adds MADV_KEEPONSUSPEND, to undo the effects of a > prior MADV_WIPEONSUSPEND for a VMA. > > Hypervisors can issue ACPI S0->S3 and S3->S0 events to leverage this > functionality in a virtualized environment. > > Alternative kernel implementation ideas: > - Move the code that clears MADV_WIPEONFORK pages to a virtual > device driver that registers itself to ACPI events. > - Add prerequisite that MADV_WIPEONFORK pages must be pinned (so > no faulting happens) and clear them in a custom/roll-your-own > device driver on a NMI handler. This could work in a virtualized > environment where the hypervisor pauses all other vCPUs before > injecting the NMI. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20170811212829.29186-1-riel@xxxxxxxxxx/ [...] > diff --git a/kernel/power/suspend.c b/kernel/power/suspend.c > index c874a7026e24..4282b7f0dd03 100644 > --- a/kernel/power/suspend.c > +++ b/kernel/power/suspend.c > @@ -323,6 +323,78 @@ static bool platform_suspend_again(suspend_state_t state) > suspend_ops->suspend_again() : false; > } > > +#ifdef VM_WIPEONSUSPEND > +static void memory_cleanup_on_suspend(suspend_state_t state) > +{ > + struct task_struct *p; > + struct mm_struct *mm; > + struct vm_area_struct *vma; > + struct page *pages[32]; > + unsigned long max_pages_per_loop = ARRAY_SIZE(pages); > + > + /* Only care about states >= S3 */ > + if (state < PM_SUSPEND_MEM) > + return; > + > + rcu_read_lock(); > + for_each_process(p) { > + int gup_flags = FOLL_WRITE; > + > + mm = p->mm; > + if (!mm) > + continue; > + > + down_read(&mm->mmap_sem); Blocking actions, such as locking semaphores, are forbidden in RCU read-side critical sections. Also, from a more high-level perspective, do we need to be careful here to avoid deadlocks with frozen tasks or stuff like that? > + for (vma = mm->mmap; vma; vma = vma->vm_next) { > + unsigned long addr, nr_pages; > + > + if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_WIPEONSUSPEND)) > + continue; > + > + addr = vma->vm_start; > + nr_pages = (vma->vm_end - addr - 1) / PAGE_SIZE + 1; > + while (nr_pages) { > + int count = min(nr_pages, max_pages_per_loop); > + void *kaddr; > + > + count = get_user_pages_remote(p, mm, addr, > + count, gup_flags, > + pages, NULL, NULL); get_user_pages_remote() can wait for disk I/O (for swapping stuff back in), which we'd probably like to avoid here. And I think it can also wait for userfaultfd handling from userspace? zap_page_range() (which is what e.g. MADV_DONTNEED uses) might be a better fit, since it can yank entries out of the page table (forcing the next write fault to allocate a new zeroed page) without faulting them into RAM. > + if (count <= 0) { > + /* > + * FIXME: In this PoC just break if we > + * get an error. > + * In the final implementation we need > + * to handle this better and not leave > + * pages uncleared. > + */ > + break; > + } > + /* Go through pages buffer and clear them. */ > + while (count) { > + struct page *page = pages[--count]; > + > + kaddr = kmap(page); > + clear_page(kaddr); > + kunmap(page); (This part should go away, but if it stayed, you'd probably want to use clear_user_highpage() or so instead of open-coding this.) > + put_page(page); > + nr_pages--; > + addr += PAGE_SIZE; > + } > + } > + } > + up_read(&mm->mmap_sem); > + } > + rcu_read_unlock(); > +} _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
