Re: [PATCH] virtio-mem: silence a static checker warning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> Am 10.06.2020 um 10:59 schrieb Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> 
> Smatch complains that "rc" can be uninitialized if we hit the "break;"
> statement on the first iteration through the loop.  I suspect that this
> can't happen in real life, but returning a zero literal is cleaner and
> silence the static checker warning.
> 

Right, it‘s impossible in real life. Thanks!

Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>

> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c
> index f658fe9149beb..893ef18060a02 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c
> @@ -1192,7 +1192,7 @@ static int virtio_mem_mb_plug_any_sb(struct virtio_mem *vm, unsigned long mb_id,
>                        VIRTIO_MEM_MB_STATE_OFFLINE);
>    }
> 
> -    return rc;
> +    return 0;
> }
> 
> /*
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux