On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 09:22:30PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 05:16:52PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-es.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-es.h > > index b2cbcd40b52e..e1ed963a57ec 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-es.h > > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-es.h > > @@ -74,5 +74,6 @@ static inline u64 lower_bits(u64 val, unsigned int bits) > > } > > > > extern void vc_no_ghcb(void); > > +extern bool vc_boot_ghcb(struct pt_regs *regs); > > Those function names need verbs: > > handle_vc_no_ghcb > handle_vc_boot_ghcb This are IDT entry points and the names above follow the convention for them, like e.g. 'page_fault', 'nmi' or 'general_protection'. Should I still add the verbs or just add a comment explaining what those symbols are? > There's already another sev_es_setup_ghcb() in compressed/. All those > functions with the same name are just confusion waiting to happen. Let's > prepend the ones in compressed/ with "early_" or so, so that their names > are at least different even if they're in two different files with the > same name. > > This way you know at least which function is used in which boot stages. Okay, will see what can be changed. Some functions are part of the interface for sev-es-shared.c and need to have the same names, but sev_es_setup_ghcb() can be named differently. > > +static void __init vc_early_vc_forward_exception(struct es_em_ctxt *ctxt) > > That second "vc" looks redundant. Heh, search and replace artifact :) Fixed now. Joerg _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
