Re: improve use_mm / unuse_mm v2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 07:31:55AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> this series improves the use_mm / unuse_mm interface by better
> documenting the assumptions, and my taking the set_fs manipulations
> spread over the callers into the core API.

I appreciate all the work you're doing here.

Do you have plans to introduce a better-named API than set_fs() / get_fs()?

Also, having set_fs() return the previous value of 'fs' would simplify
a lot of the callers.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux