On 4/14/20 3:16 PM, Michal Suchánek wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 12:24:36PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: >> On 4/14/20 2:08 AM, Christophe Leroy wrote: >>> >>> Le 14/04/2020 à 00:28, Waiman Long a écrit : >>>> Since kfree_sensitive() will do an implicit memzero_explicit(), there >>>> is no need to call memzero_explicit() before it. Eliminate those >>>> memzero_explicit() and simplify the call sites. For better correctness, >>>> the setting of keylen is also moved down after the key pointer check. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> .../allwinner/sun8i-ce/sun8i-ce-cipher.c | 19 +++++------------- >>>> .../allwinner/sun8i-ss/sun8i-ss-cipher.c | 20 +++++-------------- >>>> drivers/crypto/amlogic/amlogic-gxl-cipher.c | 12 +++-------- >>>> drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_hash.c | 3 +-- >>>> 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun8i-ce/sun8i-ce-cipher.c >>>> b/drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun8i-ce/sun8i-ce-cipher.c >>>> index aa4e8fdc2b32..8358fac98719 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun8i-ce/sun8i-ce-cipher.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun8i-ce/sun8i-ce-cipher.c >>>> @@ -366,10 +366,7 @@ void sun8i_ce_cipher_exit(struct crypto_tfm *tfm) >>>> { >>>> struct sun8i_cipher_tfm_ctx *op = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm); >>>> - if (op->key) { >>>> - memzero_explicit(op->key, op->keylen); >>>> - kfree(op->key); >>>> - } >>>> + kfree_sensitive(op->key); >>>> crypto_free_sync_skcipher(op->fallback_tfm); >>>> pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend(op->ce->dev); >>>> } >>>> @@ -391,14 +388,11 @@ int sun8i_ce_aes_setkey(struct crypto_skcipher >>>> *tfm, const u8 *key, >>>> dev_dbg(ce->dev, "ERROR: Invalid keylen %u\n", keylen); >>>> return -EINVAL; >>>> } >>>> - if (op->key) { >>>> - memzero_explicit(op->key, op->keylen); >>>> - kfree(op->key); >>>> - } >>>> - op->keylen = keylen; >>>> + kfree_sensitive(op->key); >>>> op->key = kmemdup(key, keylen, GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA); >>>> if (!op->key) >>>> return -ENOMEM; >>>> + op->keylen = keylen; >>> Does it matter at all to ensure op->keylen is not set when of->key is >>> NULL ? I'm not sure. >>> >>> But if it does, then op->keylen should be set to 0 when freeing op->key. >> My thinking is that if memory allocation fails, we just don't touch >> anything and return an error code. I will not explicitly set keylen to 0 >> in this case unless it is specified in the API documentation. > You already freed the key by now so not touching anything is not > possible. The key is set to NULL on allocation failure so setting keylen > to 0 should be redundant. However, setting keylen to 0 is consisent with > not having a key, and it avoids the possibility of leaking the length > later should that ever cause any problem. OK, I can change it to clear the key length when the allocation failed which isn't likely. Cheers, Longman _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization