On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 03:58:00PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > I've checked and it works fine on top of > ff68eb23308e6538ec7864c83d39540f423bbe90. However I'm not a fan of > removing this 'owner' structure. It gave a nice abstraction for the all > SYSMMU controllers for the given device (although most devices in the > system have only one SYSMMU). Why this structure is a problem for your > rework? Okay, the structure itself is not a problem, I just thought it is not really necessary. But to keep things simple I've taken another approach for v2 of this series: Just use the first SYSMMU of the controllers list to link the device and the IOMMU. When the owner structure exists there is always one entry in this list, so that should work fine. Regards, Joerg _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
