On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 09:17:41PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > Thomas Zimmermann had made a nice patch-set that introduced > drm_simple_encoder_init() which is already present in drm-misc-next. > > While looking at this it was suddenly obvious to me that > this was functionalty that really should be included in drm_encoder.c > The case where the core could handle the callback is pretty > common and not part of the simple pipe line. > > So after some dialog on dri-devel the conclusion was to go for > a change like this: > > drm_encoder_init_funcs() for all users that specified a > drm_encoder_funcs to extend the functionality. > > drm_encoder_init() for all users that did not > need to extend the basic functionality with > drm_encoder_funcs. > > A similar approach with a _funcs() prefix is used elsewhere in drm/ > > This required a rename of the existing users, and > a follow-up patch that moves drm_simple_encoder_init() > to drm_encoder.c > > Patches 3 in this set demonstrate the use of drm_encoder_init(). > There are many more drivers that can be converted as Thomas > has already demonstrated. > > This is all based on work done by Thomas Zimmermann, > I just wanted to implement my suggestion so > we could select the best way forward. > > Note: Daniel Vetter has hinted the approach implemented > here smelled like middle-layer. > IMO this is not so, it is just a way to handle cleanup > for the simple cases. We discussed this patch-set briefly on irc. With the upcoming drmm_ changes and such this is bad timing.. And in the end this may be pointless code-chrunch. Patch-set shelfed for now - may re-visit it later. Sam _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
