On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 10:21:36AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > But at what cost; it does unspeakable ugly to the asm. And didn't a > kernel compiled with the extended PIE range produce a measurably slower > kernel due to all the ugly? Was that true? I thought the final results were a wash and that earlier benchmarks weren't accurate for some reason? I can't find the thread now. Thomas, do you have numbers on that? BTW, I totally agree that fgkaslr is the way to go in the future. I am mostly arguing for this under the assumption that it doesn't have meaningful performance impact and that it gains the kernel some flexibility in the kinds of things it can do in the future. If the former is not true, then I'd agree, the benefit needs to be more clear. -- Kees Cook _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
