On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 02:37:08PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 11:09:41AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > No. It's coded into the hardware. Which might even be practical > > for bare-metal (e.g. on-board flash), but is very practical > > when the device is part of a hypervisor. > > If its that way on PPC, than fine for them. But since this is enablement > for x86, it should follow the x86 platform best practices, and that > means describing hardware through ACPI. I agree with this. The problem is I don't know how to get a new ACPI table or change an existing one. It needs to go through the UEFI forum in order to be accepted, and I don't have any weight there. I've been trying to get the tiny change into IORT for ages. I haven't been given any convincing reason against it or offered any alternative, it's just stalled. The topology description introduced here wasn't my first choice either but unless someone can help finding another way into ACPI, I don't have a better idea. Thanks, Jean _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
