On 2020/2/11 上午12:55, Anton Ivanov wrote:
On 09/12/2019 10:48, anton.ivanov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Some of the frames marked as GSO which arrive at
virtio_net_hdr_from_skb() have no GSO_TYPE, no
fragments (data_len = 0) and length significantly shorter
than the MTU (752 in my experiments).
This is observed on raw sockets reading off vEth interfaces
in all 4.x and 5.x kernels I tested.
These frames are reported as invalid while they are in fact
gso-less frames.
This patch marks the vnet header as no-GSO for them instead
of reporting it as invalid.
Signed-off-by: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/virtio_net.h | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_net.h b/include/linux/virtio_net.h
index 0d1fe9297ac6..d90d5cff1b9a 100644
--- a/include/linux/virtio_net.h
+++ b/include/linux/virtio_net.h
@@ -112,8 +112,12 @@ static inline int virtio_net_hdr_from_skb(const
struct sk_buff *skb,
hdr->gso_type = VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_TCPV4;
else if (sinfo->gso_type & SKB_GSO_TCPV6)
hdr->gso_type = VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_TCPV6;
- else
- return -EINVAL;
+ else {
+ if (skb->data_len == 0)
+ hdr->gso_type = VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_NONE;
+ else
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
if (sinfo->gso_type & SKB_GSO_TCP_ECN)
hdr->gso_type |= VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_ECN;
} else
ping.
Do you mean gso_size is set but gso_type is not? Looks like a bug elsewhere.
Thanks
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
