Re: [PATCH] vhost: introduce vDPA based backend

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2020/2/5 下午9:14, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 08:56:48AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 03:50:14PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
Would it be better for the map/umnap logic to happen inside each device ?
Devices that needs the IOMMU will call iommu APIs from inside the driver callback.
Technically, this can work. But if it can be done by vhost-vpda it will make
the vDPA driver more compact and easier to be implemented.
Generally speaking, in the kernel, it is normal to not hoist code of
out drivers into subsystems until 2-3 drivers are duplicating that
code. It helps ensure the right design is used

Jason
That's up to the sybsystem maintainer really, as there's also some
intuition involved in guessing a specific API is widely useful.
In-kernel APIs are flexible, if we find something isn't needed we just
drop it.


If I understand correctly. At least Intel (Ling Shan) and Brodcom (Rob) doesn't want to deal with DMA stuffs in their driver.

Anyway since the DMA bus operations is optional, driver may still choose to do DMA by itself if they want even if it requires platform IOMMU to work.

Thanks

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux