Re: [RFT 00/13] iomap: Constify ioreadX() iomem argument

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 09:13, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 9:07 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 5:53 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > The ioread8/16/32() and others have inconsistent interface among the
> > > architectures: some taking address as const, some not.
> > >
> > > It seems there is nothing really stopping all of them to take
> > > pointer to const.
> >
> > Shouldn't all of them take const volatile __iomem pointers?
> > It seems the "volatile" is missing from all but the implementations in
> > include/asm-generic/io.h.
>
> As my "volatile" comment applies to iowrite*(), too, probably that should be
> done in a separate patch.
>
> Hence with patches 1-5 squashed, and for patches 11-13:
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>

I'll add to this one also changes to ioreadX_rep() and add another
patch for volatile for reads and writes. I guess your review will be
appreciated once more because of ioreadX_rep()

Thanks,
Krzysztof
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux